District Court Litigation

Our
Engagements

District Court Litigation

  • Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC (District of Delaware) – Currently representing Plaintiff IV in a six patent infringement action against Motorola.
  • Pragmatus AV LLC v. Yahoo! Inc. (District of Delaware) – Currently representing Plaintiff Pragmatus in a five patent infringement action against Yahoo!.
  • Pragmatus AV LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. (Southern District of Florida) – Represented Plaintiff Pragmatus in a four patent infringement action against Citrix.
  • Cyberfone v. Cellco et al (District of Delaware) – Currently representing HP in a three patent infringement action against Cyberfone.
  • Cyberfone v. Federal Express et al (District of Delaware) – Currently representing Equinox Payments in a three patent infringement action against Cyberfone.
  • Profectus v. Hewlett-Packard Company (Eastern District of Texas) – Currently representing Defendant HP in a patent infringement action against Profectus.
  • Geotag v. Where2Getit (Eastern District of Texas) – Currently representing Defendant Monster Cable in a patent infringement action against Geotag.
  • Cardsoft v. VeriFone et al (Eastern District of Texas) – Represented Defendant Hypercom in a patent infringement action against Cardsoft.
  • IntraVisual v. Trident Microsystems et al (Eastern District of Texas) –  Represented Defendant Trident Microsystems in a patent infringement action against IntraVisual.
  • KGR v. Honda (Northern District of California) – Represented Plaintiff KGR in a patent infringement action against three Honda entities.
  • KGR v. Ford Motor Company (Northern District of California) –  Represented Plaintiff KGR in a patent infringement action against Ford.
  • TriStrata v. Adobe Systems Incorporated (Northern District of California) – Currently representing Defendant Adobe in a two patent infringement action against TriStrata.
  • MicroUnity v. Palm (Eastern District of Texas) – Represented Defendant Palm in a twelve patent infringement action against MicroUnity.
  • Xpoint v. Palm (District of Delaware) – Represented Defendant Palm in a patent infringement action against Xpoint.
  • U.S. Philips v. Palm (Northern District of California) – Represented Defendant Palm in a patent infringement action against Philips.
  • EON v. Palm (District of Delaware, Eastern District of Texas) –  Represented Defendant Palm in two patent infringement actions against EON.
  • T5 Labs v. Gaikai (District of Delaware) – Currently representing T5 in a patent infringement action against Gaikai.
  • Technology Patents v. Vodafone et al (District of Maryland) – Represented Defendant Vodafone in a patent infringement action against Technology Patents.